Secure AI design
April 2026: Secure Generative AI Patterns
An April field note on secure generative AI design patterns for retrieval, prompts, access, evaluation, and human review.
Architecture Lens
Secure generative AI by controlling the context path
Generative AI security is not limited to model access. The context path also includes source approval, retrieval filters, identity-aware permissions, prompt behavior, evaluation, logging, and human review. Each layer needs clear controls before users rely on generated output.
- Authorize retrieval by user identity and document permissions, not only by application access.
- Log prompt, retrieval, response, policy decision, and human review events at the right level of detail.
- Use evaluation sets for privacy, hallucination, source attribution, toxic content, and restricted workflows.
Identity, session, device, and business context.
Allowed action, data scope, and safety rules.
Approved sources, permissions, freshness, and citations.
Evaluation, logging, escalation, and feedback.
Original InSkyto diagram informed by NIST Generative AI Profile and Microsoft Zero Trust principles.
Delivery Pattern
Treat prompts like application behavior
Prompt rules, grounding instructions, refusal behavior, and escalation paths shape what users can do. They should be versioned, tested, reviewed, and monitored like application logic.
Checklist
Evidence to collect before launch
Before launch, keep evidence for approved sources, prompt versions, evaluation results, access rules, human review criteria, and response monitoring so the team can explain system behavior under audit or incident review.
How InSkyto helps
Practical notes for technology decisions
Connect each topic to architecture, delivery risk, operating cost, and business adoption.
Explain repeatable approaches teams can adapt across cloud, AI, data, security, and application work.
Focus on field-tested practices, decision criteria, and implementation details rather than trend commentary.